In the fast-paced world of athletic footwear, the battle between Mizuno Neo Vista and New Balance SC Trainer V3 has piqued the interest of many runners. Both shoes have a lot to offer, but which one is the better super trainer for you? Let’s break it down quickly:
Upper
- Mizuno Neo Vista: Breathable knitted upper; lacks cushioning.
- New Balance SC Trainer V3: Traditional mesh with better cushioning; snug fit.
Midsole
- Mizuno Neo Vista: Soft Enerzy NXT foam with a glass-infused waveplate; best for comfortable, bouncy runs.
- New Balance SC Trainer V3: FuelCell foam and carbon plate; great for aggressive runs with energy return.
Outsole
- Mizuno Neo Vista: Grippy but thin rubber; cautious on wet surfaces.
- New Balance SC Trainer V3: Thicker rubber with excellent traction; more durable.
Fit
- Mizuno Neo Vista: True-to-size, decent toe space.
- New Balance SC Trainer V3: True-to-size but narrow toe box; consider sizing up for wider feet.
Performance
- Mizuno Neo Vista: Ideal for moderate to long runs.
- New Balance SC Trainer V3: Excels at faster paces, not for slow runs.
- Cost: Both priced at $180, so your decision will hinge on features rather than price.
In essence, if you’re searching for a plush, daily running shoe, Mizuno Neo Vista might be your go-to. However, for those seeking a blend of comfort and performance, the New Balance SC Trainer V3 is a formidable contender.
Comparison of Mizuno Neo Vista vs. New Balance SC Trainer v3
Contents
Upper
Mizuno Neo Vista
- Features a unique booty-style design with a fully knitted upper.
- Breathable and durable but lacks cushioning in key areas like the tongue and collar.
- Provides a snug fit, but could benefit from additional padding.
New Balance SC Trainer v3
- Utilizes a traditional engineered mesh upper for enhanced durability and breathability.
- Offers good cushioning in the tongue and collar, providing a solid lockdown.
- The toe box is narrower, which may cause discomfort for those with wider feet.
Midsole
Mizuno Neo Vista
- Equipped with the Enerzy NXT midsole, featuring two layers of squishy EVA foam.
- Includes a glass-infused waveplate for rigidity and structure.
- Best for runners seeking a soft and bouncy experience during moderate paces.
New Balance SC Trainer v3
- Made from FuelCell foam, combining PEBA and EVA for a firmer feel.
- Contains a stiff energy carbon plate using Energy Arc technology for enhanced energy return.
- Designed for aggressive running, offering responsiveness at faster paces.
Outsole
Mizuno Neo Vista
- Tacky rubber outsole provides good grip even on wet surfaces.
- The rubber is soft and thin, requiring caution on slippery terrain.
New Balance SC Trainer v3
- Features thicker rubber with diamond-shaped tread patterns for superior traction.
- More durable than the Neo Vista, offering better longevity and responsiveness.
Fit
Mizuno Neo Vista
- True-to-size with a snug fit around the midfoot.
- Provides some room in the toe area, making it comfortable without needing to size up.
New Balance SC Trainer v3
- Also true-to-size but has a narrow toe box that may require sizing up for wider feet.
Performance
Mizuno Neo Vista
- Offers a lightweight feel adaptable to various paces, excelling at long-run paces.
- Not ideal for racing or intense workouts due to lack of aggressive propulsion.
New Balance SC Trainer v3
- Designed for aggressive performance, excelling at fast paces and marathon speeds.
- High stack cushioning performs well at moderate and long-run paces but feels heavy at slower speeds.
Cost
Both models are priced at $180 USD with limited color options:
- Mizuno Neo Vista: Shades of blue.
- New Balance SC Trainer v3: Black/Phantom and White/Cyber Jade.
Weight Comparison
| Shoe Model | Weight |
|---|---|
| Mizuno Neo Vista | 266.4 g |
| New Balance SC Trainer v3 | 261 g |
The New Balance SC Trainer v3 is slightly lighter, which may appeal to those prioritizing weight in their training shoes.
Durability and Longevity
The New Balance SC Trainer v3’s thicker rubber outsole provides greater durability than the Mizuno Neo Vista. Its robust design ensures longer-lasting performance, especially under rigorous conditions.
Final Thought: Which One Should You Buy?
For those seeking comfort and plushness for daily runs, the Mizuno Neo Vista offers an excellent choice. Meanwhile, if you’re after aggressive performance with a blend of comfort, the New Balance SC Trainer v3 stands out as a solid option.
FAQs
Does the New Balance SC trainer have a carbon plate?
Yes. The New Balance SC Trainer v3 includes a curved carbon plate with Energy Arc technology for enhanced energy return.
What is the heel drop of the SC v3?
The heel-to-toe drop is 6 mm, offering balanced support across various running speeds.
Are Mizuno Neo Vista True-to-size?
Yes. Mizuno Neo Vista fits true-to-size with a snug midfoot fit and enough toe room to keep you comfortable.
Conclusion
In the dynamic world of running shoes, choosing between the Mizuno Neo Vista and New Balance SC Trainer V3 is like selecting the right tool for your unique journey. The Mizuno Neo Vista captivates with its breathable knitted upper and plush Enerzy NXT midsole, offering a cozy embrace for moderate to long-distance runs. Its lightweight feel and roomy toe box make it a reliable companion for daily training.
Conversely, the New Balance SC Trainer V3 stands as a powerhouse of performance. With its FuelCell foam and carbon plate, it delivers explosive energy return, perfect for those chasing speed. The traditional mesh upper offers snug support, though its narrow toe box may require some runners to size up.
When it comes to traction and durability, the SC Trainer V3’s thicker rubber outsole outshines the Neo Vista’s thinner grip, ensuring longevity even on challenging terrains.
Both priced at $180, your choice hinges not on cost but on what you seek in a shoe. If comfort is your priority, lean towards Mizuno; if aggressive performance is your goal, New Balance beckons. Each shoe tells a different story—choose the one that aligns with your running narrative.
